Free CFA Institute CFA-Level-III Exam Questions

Try our Free Demo Practice Tests for Comprehensive CFA-Level-III Exam Preparation

  • CFA Institute CFA-Level-III Exam Questions
  • Provided By: CFA Institute
  • Exam: CFA Level III Chartered Financial Analyst
  • Certification: CFA Level III
  • Total Questions: 365
  • Updated On: Feb 18, 2025
  • Rated: 4.9 |
  • Online Users: 730
Page No. 1 of 73
Add To Cart
  • Question 1
    • Dakota Watson and Anthony Smith are bond portfolio managers for Northern Capital Investment Advisors,
      which is based in the U.S. Northern Capital has $2,000 million under management, with S950 million of that in
      the bond market. Northern Capital's clients are primarily institutional investors such as insurance companies,
      foundations, and endowments. Because most clients insist on a margin over the relevant bond benchmark,
      Watson and Smith actively manage their bond portfolios, while at the same time trying to minimize tracking
      error.
      One of the funds that Northern Capital offers invests in emerging market bonds. An excerpt from its prospectus
      reveals the following fund objectives and strategies:
      “The fund generates a return by constructing a portfolio using all major fixed-income sectors within the Asian
      region (except Japan) with a bias towards non-government bonds. The fund makes opportunistic investments
      in both investment grade and high yield bonds. Northern Capital analysts seek those bond issues that are
      expected to outperform U.S. bonds with similar credit risk, interest rate risk, and liquidity risk-Value is added by
      finding those bonds that have been overlooked by other developed world bond funds. The fund favors nondollar, local currency denominated securities to avoid the default risk associated with a lack of hard currency on
      the part of issuer."
      Although Northern Capital does examine the availability of excess returns in foreign markets by investing
      outside the index in these markets, most of its strategies focus on U.S. bonds and spread analysis of them.
      Discussing the analysis of spreads in the U.S. bond market, Watson comments on the usefulness of the option
      adjusted spread and the swap spread and makes the following statements:
      Statement 1: Due to changes in the structure of the primary bond market in the U.S., the option adjusted
      spread is increasingly valuable for analyzing the attractiveness of bond investments.
      Statement 2: The advantage of the swap spread framework is that investors can compare the relative
      attractiveness of fixed-rate and floating-rate bond markets.
      Watson's view of the U.S. economy is decidedly bearish. She is concerned that the recent withdrawal of liquidity
      from the U.S. financial system will result in a U.S. recession, possibly even a depression. She forecasts that
      interest rates in the U.S. will continue to fall as the demand for loanable funds declines with the lack of business
      investment. Meanwhile, she believes that the Federal Reserve will continue to keep short-term rates low in
      order to stimulate the economy. Although she sees the level of yields declining, she believes that the spread on
      risky securities will increase due to the decline in business prospects. She therefore has reallocated her bond
      portfolio away from high-yield bonds and towards investment grade bonds.
      Smith is less decided about the economy. However, his trading strategy has been quite successful in the past.
      As an example of his strategy, he recently sold a 20-year AA-rated $50,000 Mahan Corporation bond with a
      7.75% coupon that he had purchased at par. With the proceeds, he then bought a newly issued A-rated Quincy
      Corporation bond that offered an 8.25% coupon. By swapping the first bond for the second bond, he enhanced
      his annual income, which he considers quite favorable given the declining yields in the market.
      Watson has become quite interested in the mortgage market. With the anticipated decline in interest rates, she
      expects that the yields on mortgages will decline. As a result, she has reallocated the portion of Northern
      Capital's bond portfolio dedicated to mortgages. She has shifted the holdings from 8.50% coupon mortgages to
      7.75% coupon mortgages, reasoning that if interest rates do drop, the lower coupon mortgages will rise in price
      more than the higher coupon mortgages. She identifies this trade as a structure trade.
      Smith is examining the liquidity of three bonds. Their characteristics are listed in the table below:
      CFA-Level-III-page476-image280
      Which of the following best describes the relative value analysis used in the Northern Capita! Emerging market
      bond fund? It is a:

      Answer: B
  • Question 2
    • Mark Stober, William Robertson, and James McGuire are consultants for a regional pension consultancy. One of their clients, Richard Smitherspoon, chief investment officer of Quality Car Part Manufacturing, recently attended a conference on risk management topics for pension plans. Smitherspoon is a conservative manager who prefers to follow a long-term investment strategy with little portfolio turnover. Smitherspoon has substantial experience in managing a defined benefit plan but has little experience with risk management issues. Smitherspoon decides to discuss how Quality can begin implementing risk management techniques with Stober, Robertson, and McGuire. Quality's risk exposure is evaluated on a quarterly basis. Before implementing risk management techniques, Smitherspoon expresses confusion regarding some measures of risk management. "I know beta and standard deviation, but what is all this stuff about convexity, delta, gamma, and vega?" Stober informs Smitherspoon that delta is the first derivative of the call-stock price curve, and Robertson adds that gamma is the relationship between how bond prices change with changing time to maturity. Smitherspoon is still curious about risk management techniques, and in particular the concept of VAR. He asks, "What does a daily 5% VAR of $5 million mean? I just get so confused with whether VAR is a measure of maximum or minimum loss. Just last month, the consultant from MinRisk, a competing consulting firm, told me it was ‘a measure of maximum loss, which in your case means we are 95% confident that the maximum 1-day loss is $5.0 million." McGuire states that his definition of VAR is that "VAR is a measure that combines probabilities over a certain time horizon with dollar amounts, which in your case means that one expects to lose a minimum $5 million five trading days out of every 100." Smitherspoon expresses bewilderment at the different methods for determining VAR. "Can't you risk management types formulate a method that works like calculating a beta? It would be so easy if there were a method that allowed one to just use mean and standard deviation. I need a VAR that I can get my arms around." The next week, Stober visits the headquarters of TopTech, a communications firm. Their CFO is Ralph Long, who prefers to manage the firm's pension himself because he believes he can time the market and spot upcoming trends before analysts can. Long also believes that risk measurement for TopTech can be evaluated annually because of his close attention to the portfolio. Stober calculates TopTech's 95% surplus at risk to be S500 million for an annual horizon. The expected return on TopTech's asset base (currently at S2 billion) is 5%. The plan has a surplus of $100 million. Stober uses a 5% probability level to calculate the minimum amount by which the plan will be underfunded next year. Of the following VAR calculation methods, the measure that would most likely suit Smitherspoon is the:

      Answer: A
  • Question 3
    • Garrison Investments is a money management firm focusing on endowment management for small colleges
      and universities. Over the past 20 years, the firm has primarily invested in U.S. securities with small allocations
      to high quality long-term foreign government bonds. Garrison's largest account, Point University, has a market
      value of $800 million and an asset allocation as detailed in Figure 1.
      Figure 1: Point University Asset Allocation
      CFA-Level-III-page476-image275
      *Bond coupon payments are all semiannual. Managers at Garrison are concerned that expectations for a strengthening U.S. dollar relative to the British pound could negatively impact returns to Point University's U.K. bond allocation. Therefore, managers have collected information on swap and exchange rates. Currently, the swap rates in the United States and the United Kingdom are 4.9% and 5.3%, respectively. The spot exchange rate is 0.45 GBP/USD. The U.K. bonds are currently trading at face value. Garrison recently convinced the board of trustees at Point University that the endowment should allocate a portion of the portfolio into international equities, specifically European equities. The board has agreed to the plan but wants the allocation to international equities to be a short-term tactical move. Managers at Garrison have put together the following proposal for the reallocation: To minimize trading costs while gaining exposure to international equities, the portfolio can use futures contracts on the domestic 12-month mid-cap equity index and on the 12-month European equity index. This strategy will temporarily exchange $80 million of U.S. mid-cap exposure for European equity index exposure. Relevant data on the futures contracts are provided in Figure 2. Figure 2: Mid-cap index and European Index Futures Data
      CFA-Level-III-page476-image274
      Three months after proposing the international diversification plan, Garrison was able to persuade Point
      University to make a direct short-term investment of $2 million in Haikuza Incorporated (HI), a Japanese
      electronics firm. HI exports its products primarily to the United States and Europe, selling only 30% of its
      production in Japan. In order to control the costs of its production inputs, HI uses currency futures to mitigate
      exchange rate fluctuations associated with contractual gold purchases from Australia. In its current contract, HI
      has one remaining purchase of Australian gold that will occur in nine months. The company has hedged the
      purchase with a long 12-month futures contract on the Australian dollar (AUD).
      Managers at Garrison are expecting to sell the HI position in one year, but have become nervous about the
      impact of an expected depreciation in the value of the Yen relative to the U.S. dollar. Thus, they have decided
      to use a currency futures hedge. Analysts at Garrison have estimated that the covariance between the local
      currency returns on HI and changes in the USD/Yen spot rate is -0.184 and that the variance of changes in the
      USD/Yen spot rate is 0.92.
      Which of the following best describes the minimum variance hedge ratio for Garrison's currency futures hedge
      on the Haikuza investment?

      Answer: A
  • Question 4
    • Carl Cramer is a recent hire at Derivatives Specialists Inc. (DSI), a small consulting firm that advises a variety
      of institutions on the management of credit risk. Some of DSI's clients are very familiar with risk management
      techniques whereas others are not. Cramer has been assigned the task of creating a handbook on credit risk,
      its possible impact, and its management. His immediate supervisor, Christine McNally, will assist Cramer in the
      creation of the handbook and will review it. Before she took a position at DSI, McNally advised banks and other
      institutions on the use of value-at-risk (VAR) as well as credit-at-risk (CAR).
      Cramer's first task is to address the basic dimensions of credit risk. He states that the first dimension of credit
      risk is the probability of an event that will cause a loss. The second dimension of credit risk is the amount lost,
      which is a function of the dollar amount recovered when a loss event occurs. Cramer recalls the considerable
      difficulty he faced when transacting with Johnson Associates, a firm which defaulted on a contract with the
      Grich Company. Grich forced Johnson Associates into bankruptcy and Johnson Associates was declared in
      default of all its agreements. Unfortunately, DSI then had to wait until the bankruptcy court decided on all claims
      before it could settle the agreement with Johnson Associates.
      McNally mentions that Cramer should include a statement about the time dimension of credit risk. She states
      that the two primary time dimensions of credit risk are current and future. Current credit risk relates to the
      possibility of default on current obligations, while future credit risk relates to potential default on future
      obligations. If a borrower defaults and claims bankruptcy, a creditor can file claims representing the face value
      of current obligations and the present value of future obligations. Cramer adds that combining current and
      potential credit risk analysis provides the firm's total credit risk exposure and that current credit risk is usually a
      reliable predictor of a borrower's potential credit risk.
      As DSI has clients with a variety of forward contracts, Cramer then addresses the credit risks associated with
      forward agreements. Cramer states that long forward contracts gain in value when the market price of the
      underlying increases above the contract price. McNally encourages Cramer to include an example of credit risk
      and forward contracts in the handbook. She offers the following:
      A forward contract sold by Palmer Securities has six months until the delivery date and a contract price of 50.
      The underlying asset has no cash flows or storage costs and is currently priced at 50. In the contract, no funds
      were exchanged upfront.
      Cramer also describes how a client firm of DSI can control the credit risks in their derivatives transactions. He
      writes that firms can make use of netting arrangements, create a special purpose vehicle, require collateral
      from counterparties, and require a mark-to-market provision. McNally adds that Cramer should include a
      discussion of some newer forms of credit protection in his handbook. McNally thinks credit derivatives
      represent an opportunity for DSL She believes that one type of credit derivative that should figure prominently in
      their handbook is total return swaps. She asserts that to purchase protection through a total return swap, the
      holder of a credit asset will agree to pass the total return on the asset to the protection seller (e.g., a swap
      dealer) in exchange for a single, fixed payment representing the discounted present value of expected cash
      flows from the asset.
      A DSI client, Weaver Trading, has a bond that they are concerned will increase in credit risk. Weaver would like
      protection against this event in the form of a payment if the bond's yield spread increases beyond LIBOR plus
      3%. Weaver Trading prefers a cash settlement.
      Later that week, Cramer and McNally visit a client's headquarters and discuss the potential hedge of a bond
      issued by Cuellar Motors. Cuellar manufactures and markets specialty luxury motorcycles. The client is
      considering hedging the bond using a credit spread forward, because he is concerned that a downturn in the
      economy could result in a default on the Cuellar bond. The client holds $2,000,000 in par of the Cuellar bond
      and the bond's coupons are paid annually. The bond's current spread over the U.S. Treasury rate is 2.5%. The
      characteristics of the forward contract are shown below.
      Information on the Credit Spread Forward
      CFA-Level-III-page476-image200
      Regarding their statements concerning current and future credit risk, determine whether Cramer and McNally
      are correct or incorrect.

      Answer: B
  • Question 5
    • Milson Investment Advisors (MIA) specializes in managing fixed income portfolios for institutional clients. Many
      of MIA's clients are able to take on substantial portfolio risk and therefore the firm's funds invest in all credit
      qualities and in international markets. Among its investments, MIA currently holds positions in the debt of Worth
      inc., Enertech Company, and SBK Company.
      Worth Inc. is a heavy equipment manufacturer in Germany. The company finances a significant amount of its
      fixed assets using bonds. Worth's current debt outstanding is in the form of non-callable bonds issued two
      years ago at a coupon rate of 7.2% and a maturity of 15 years. Worth expects German interest rates to decline
      by as much as 200 basis points (bps) over the next year and would like to take advantage of the decline. The
      company has decided to enter into a 2-year interest rate swap with semiannual payments, a swap rate of 5.8%,
      and a floating rate based on 6-month EURIBOR. The duration of the fixed side of the swap is 1.2. Analysts at
      MIA have made the following comments regarding Worth's swap plan:
      • "The duration of the swap from the perspective of Worth is 0.95."
      • "By entering into the swap, the duration of Worth's long-term liabilities will become smaller, causing the value
      of the firm's equity to become more sensitive to changes in interest rates."
      Enertech Company is a U.S.-based provider of electricity and natural gas. The company uses a large proportion
      of floating rate notes to finance its operations. The current interest rate on Enertech's floating rate notes, based
      on 6-month LIBOR plus 150bp, is 5.5%. To hedge its interest rate risk, Enertech has decided to enter into a
      long interest rate collar. The cap and the floor of the collar have maturities of two years, with settlement dates
      (in arrears) every six months. The strike rate for the cap is 5.5% and for the floor is 4.5%, based on 6-month
      LIBOR, which is forecast to be 5.2%, 6.1%, 4.1%, and 3.8%, in 6,12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Each
      settlement period consists of 180 days. Analysts at MIA are interested in assessing the attributes of the collar.
      SBK Company builds oil tankers and other large ships in Norway. The firm has several long-term bond issues
      outstanding with fixed interest rates ranging from 5.0% to 7.5% and maturities ranging from 5 to 12 years.
      Several years ago, SBK took the pay floating side of a semi-annual settlement swap with a rate of 6.0%, a
      floating rate based on LIBOR, and a tenor of eight years. The firm now believes interest rates may increase in 6
      months, but is not 100% confident in this assumption. To hedge the risk of an interest rate increase, given its
      interest rate uncertainty, the firm has sold a payer interest rate swaption with a maturity of 6 months, an
      underlying swap rate of 6.0%, and a floating rate based on LIBOR.
      MIA is considering investing in the debt of Rio Corp, a Brazilian energy company. The investment would be in
      Rio's floating rate notes, currently paying a coupon of 8.0%. MIA's economists are forecasting an interest rate
      decline in Brazil over the short term.
      Determine whether the MIA analysts' comments regarding the duration of the Worth Inc. swap and the effects
      of the swap on the company's balance sheet are correct or incorrect.

      Answer: C
PAGE: 1 - 73
Add To Cart

© Copyrights Dumpscity 2025. All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure your best experience. So we hope you are happy to receive all cookies on the Dumpscity.